IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v10y2010i2p25-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System

Author

Listed:
  • Liliana B. Andonova

    (Liliana B. Andonova is Associate Professor in Political Science at the Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland. She is author of Transnational Politics of the Environment: EU Integration and Environmental Policy in Eastern Europe (2004). Her current research focuses on international organizations and public-private partnerships, transnational governance, climate cooperation, and regional environmental politics in Europe. She has published in journals such Global Governance, Global Environmental Politics, International Studies Quarterly, International Studies Perspective, Comparative Political Studies. Andonova is co-founder of the section on Development and Environment of the Swiss Political Science Association; current collaborative activities include the Leverhulme Foundation Project on Transnational Climate Governance; the SNIS Project Negotiating Climate Change; and the Graduate Institute project with the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment on Climate Information for Decision Making.)

Abstract

The article examines the politics and patterns of public-private partnerships for the environment in the multilateral system. It argues that two kinds of dynamics have contributed to the hybridization of environmental authority at the global level. On one hand, the fragmentation of environmental regimes and the parallel growth of non-state actors have resulted in structural pressures and opportunities for public-private collaboration. More significantly, however, international organizations have responded to the pluralization of global environmental politics selectively and acted as entrepreneurs of collaborative governance. The analysis uses a principal-agent perspective of international organizations to specify the conditions for organizational entrepreneurship of public-private partnerships. The theoretical propositions inform the comparative analysis of three "meta" partnership programs in the multilateral system: the Small Grants Program, the Prototype Carbon Fund, and the environmental portfolio of the United Nations Fund for International Partnerships. The study demonstrates that public-private partnerships represent neither a radical "powershift" from established institutions, nor are partnerships a marginal governance fad. The three partnership programs examined here emerged out of the mandates and expertise of their lead organizations and partners, but established and diffused new niches of environmental governance, particularly around community-based biodiversity management and climate-change related technology diffusion. (c) 2010 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Liliana B. Andonova, 2010. "Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(2), pages 25-53, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:25-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.25
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:25-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.