IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v20y2025i1p85-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?

Author

Listed:
  • Shaun M. Dougherty

    (Lynch School of Education and Human Development Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA 02467)

  • Mary M. Smith

    (Peabody College of Education and Human Development Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203)

Abstract

Career and technical education (CTE) has existed in the United States for over a century, and only in recent years have there been opportunities to assess the causal impact of participating in these programs while in high school. To date, no work has assessed whether the relative costs of these programs meet or exceed the benefits as described in recent evaluations. In this paper, we use available cost data to compare average costs per pupil in standalone high school CTE programs in Connecticut and Massachusetts to the most likely counterfactual schools. Under a variety of conservative assumptions about the monetary value of known educational and social benefits, we find that programs in Massachusetts offer clear positive returns on investment, whereas programs in Connecticut offer smaller, though mostly non-negative expected returns. We also consider the potential cost effectiveness of CTE programs offered in other contexts to address questions of generalizability.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaun M. Dougherty & Mary M. Smith, 2025. "At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(1), pages 85-109, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:85-109
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00418
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:85-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.