IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/edfpol/v20y2025i1p110-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Coffey

    (Department of Economics Saint Anselm College Manchester, NH 03102)

Abstract

Today, all 50 states have enacted mandates requiring some level of insurance coverage for the treatment of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In this paper, I examine the impact of Massachusetts’ mandate, ARICA (An Act Relative to Insurance Coverage for Autism) on the academic and behavioral outcomes of students with ASD in the state. Using administrative data on Massachusetts public school students, I use a triple difference strategy to estimate impacts on special education setting, attendance, suspensions, and achievement. I find that ARICA increased inclusion for students with ASD; they were 4 percentage points more likely to be fully included after the reform. Further, days suspended decreased by about 26 percent, and the likelihood of receiving a suspension decreased by about 2 percentage points. I find that improvements in student outcomes were larger for students in grades 6–8 (versus elementary students). While I find no statistically significant improvement in test scores for students with ASD overall, math (English language arts) achievement increased by 0.09 (0.13) standard deviation for students in middle grades.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Coffey, 2025. "The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 20(1), pages 110-136, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:110-136
    DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00420
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/edfp_a_00420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:110-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: The MIT Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.