IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/asiaec/v23y2024i3p34-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Ambiguity in the Time of  a  Second Cold  War

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Joy V. Abrenica
  • Ricardo Rafael S. Guzman
  • Anthony G. Sabarillo

Abstract

In the competition for hegemony of major powers, it seems logical for a small or middle power state to be ambiguous on its preference. Aligning with one protagonist for protection and preferential treatment can only be at the expense of antagonizing the other. Conventional wisdom holds that hedging is practical as it allows a country to leverage on its amicable relations with both powers. The ASEAN states are caught in the middle of the U.S.–China economic rivalry as well as directly engaged in maritime disputes with China. This paper evaluates strategic ambiguity versus alignment against the backdrop of trade decoupling of rival superpowers. Using a multi-sector, multi-country Ricardian trade model, our simulation results reveal that it is in the interest of some economies to align with one of two camps, contrary to conventional wisdom. The diverse welfare effects of decoupling on member states prevent the attainment of a unified ASEAN position and undermine ASEAN centrality in curbing the risk of a second cold war.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Joy V. Abrenica & Ricardo Rafael S. Guzman & Anthony G. Sabarillo, 2024. "Strategic Ambiguity in the Time of  a  Second Cold  War," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 23(3), pages 34-52, Fall.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:34-52
    DOI: 10.1162/asep_a_00905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00905
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/asep_a_00905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:asiaec:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:34-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.