IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tei/journl/v10y2017i2p7-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoclassical and technological catching-up as the channels of the real convergence process in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Izabela Młynarzewska - Borowiec

    (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Radom, Poland)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the paper is to investigate the β-convergence process between European Union member states in the period 2000-2014 and identify channels of that process. The paper attempts to illustrate if the investigated group of countries experienced convergence because of capital accumulation, technological catching-up or via both mechanisms. Design/methodology/approach: The framework used to test the relative strength of neoclassical and technological catching-up as convergence driving forces combines the neoclassical and endogenous representations of the economic growth process. The tests are conducted with the use of cross- sectional as well as panel data analysis, including the proper methods of estimation. Findings: The paper provides evidence for the presence of the β-convergence process among European Union countries in the period 2000-2014. The obtained results confirmed that in the analysed period, both channels of convergence (neoclassical and technological) occurred in the group of 27 EU member states. The technological mechanism seemed to be more important than the neoclassical one, especially between the “new” EU countries. In the group of “old” EU members no evidence of technological channel convergence was found. The preliminary survey on the existence of productivity convergence in the analysed groups confirmed its existence in the EU-27 and EU-12 group. Results for the EU-15 group were ambiguous. Research limitations/implications: As the results obtained for the EU-15 group were slightly different depending on the research method used, in the future, it would be advisable to carry out an additional study using an alternative research method. Moreover, further research on these issues should be explored towards much more accurate analysis of the productivity convergence and its impact on the real convergence process in the analysed groups of countries. Originality/value: The paper is an important step, giving direction to studies on determinants of the real convergence process in the EU. According to the obtained results, technological channel, not capital accumulation, is the driving force of the converge process in the European Union. It might be an important signal for the future convergence policy pursued at the national and European level. The policy concentrated on the dynamics of capital seems not to be effective enough to increase the speed of the convergence process between European Union member states in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Izabela Młynarzewska - Borowiec, 2017. "Neoclassical and technological catching-up as the channels of the real convergence process in the European Union," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 10(2), pages 7-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:7-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/docs/volume10_issue2/neoclassical_technological_catching_up.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ijbesar.af.duth.gr/volume10_issue2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    real convergence process; European Union; capital accumulation; technological catching-up;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F43 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Economic Growth of Open Economies
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tei:journl:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:7-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kostas Stergidis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dbikagr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.