IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v8y2020i1p205-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Authority of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) Against Youtube and Netflix According to Law Number 32 of 2002 Regarding Broadcasting

Author

Listed:
  • Astria Yuli Satyarini Sukendar

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Amanda Raissa

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

  • Tomy Michael

    (Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya)

Abstract

Today there are a lot of developments in broadcast technology in Indonesia, educational and quality shows are an important need for everyone. That is because quality shows will form a quality society.  Broadcast technology that is currently well-known and widely discussed and widely accessed by people in Indonesia is Youtube and Netflix, people who want to access videos and films will be spoiled with the convenience provided by this platform. But what is unfortunate from the existence of Youtube and Netflix is the vastness of shows that can be accessed by everyone and also children without any screening, supervision, and mastery of the Indonesian Censorship Institution first. For now, the government still cannot do anything in filtering shows that should not be broadcast on Youtube and Netflix, because in Law Number 32 of 2002 on Broadcasting it does not explicitly explain the authority of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission in overseeing content on both platforms like Youtube and Netflix. Therefore, in this writing the author will highlight how the Government can take a position to filter out content that should not be displayed to the public in Indonesia as well as surveillance conducted on the Youtube and Netflix platforms. The method used in this writing is Juridical Empirical in which the writer looks at the facts that exist in society and mix and match with the rules and laws that exist and apply in Indonesia. The result of this writing is that there needs to be a change in the Broadcasting Law so that there is supervision and also restrictions on the content displayed on the digital platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Astria Yuli Satyarini Sukendar & Amanda Raissa & Tomy Michael, 2020. "Authority of the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) Against Youtube and Netflix According to Law Number 32 of 2002 Regarding Broadcasting," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 205-211, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:205-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/815/270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/815/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Citra Alambara & Made Warka & Slamet Suhartono, 2022. "The urgence of the code of conduct of the professional advocate in Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 368-373, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Youtube; Netflix; Indonesian Broadcasting Commission;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:205-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.