IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v4y2020i1p73-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theoretical Legal Assumptions for the United Nations Security Council Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Luis Silva Gonzalez

    (Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Pinar del Rio, Cuba)

  • Orelvis Gener Crespo

    (Trinidad Municipal People's Court, Sancti Spiritus, Cuba)

  • Pedro Alejandro Vigil Garcia

    (Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Pinar del Rio, Cuba)

Abstract

The United Nation Security Council, although it has been the most reformed organ of the Organization, does not currently respond to the claims of democracy of the international community. In this regard, this article proposes four theoretical legal assumptions that should underpin the democratization of the aforementioned organ, regarding the structure and operation established by the UN Charter. The use of applicable methods in the Legal Sciences allowed the formulation of the postulates, among them: the recognition of the perspective of democracy in the UN Charter, and the transformation of the voting system into non-procedural matters and in relation to the processes of reform and revision of the UN Charter.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Luis Silva Gonzalez & Orelvis Gener Crespo & Pedro Alejandro Vigil Garcia, 2020. "Theoretical Legal Assumptions for the United Nations Security Council Reform," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 4(1), pages 73-83, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:73-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.techniumscience.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/101/80
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.techniumscience.org/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Security Council; United Nation; Public International Low;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:4:y:2020:i:1:p:73-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.