IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v34y2022i1p237-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemistry Teachers' TPACK Competence: Teacher Perception and Lesson Plan Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nurlaila Hayati

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

  • Asep Kadarohman

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

  • Wahyu Sopandi

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

  • Muhamad Abdulkadir Martoprawiro

    (Institut Teknologi Bandung)

  • Diana Rochintaniawati

    (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

Abstract

This descriptive study aims to describe chemistry teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) competence based on teacher perception and lesson plan analysis. Chemistry teachers' perceptions were obtained through the TPACK questionnaire, which was developed based on components in the TPACK framework. Meanwhile, the lesson plan analysis is carried out through a rubric developed based on the TPACK indicator for the lesson plan. The respondent was 86 chemistry teachers who teach in one Indonesian province. Sampling for the analysis of teacher perceptions was carried out through purposive sampling, and the sample lesson plans were selected from several respondents who filled out the TPACK questionnaire. Both data sets were analyzed descriptively. The results of the TPACK perception analysis of chemistry teachers on the components of TK, PK, and PCK show that they have sufficient ability. These results align with the analysis of the lesson plans they made, which are in the good category. In the CK and TPK components, chemistry teachers' perception shows they have sufficient ability. It is not in line with the results of the analysis of lesson plans which are in the poor category. In TCK component, chemistry teachers' perception shows they have less ability. These results are quite in line with the analysis of lesson plans which are in the very poor category. Finally, the results of the analysis on TPACK component show that chemistry teachers are unsure or doubtful about their abilities, while the results of the analysis of lesson plans are in the very poor category.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurlaila Hayati & Asep Kadarohman & Wahyu Sopandi & Muhamad Abdulkadir Martoprawiro & Diana Rochintaniawati, 2022. "Chemistry Teachers' TPACK Competence: Teacher Perception and Lesson Plan Analysis," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 237-247, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:237-247
    DOI: 10.47577/tssj.v34i1.7079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7079/2500
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/7079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/tssj.v34i1.7079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dodik Septian Ferdiansyah & Syaad Patmanthara & Hary Suswanto, 2022. "Evaluation of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Teachers of SMK Negeri 6 Malang (Case Study of Electrical Power Installation Engineering and Autotronic Engineering)," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 27(1), pages 70-82, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      chemistry teachers; lesson plan analysis; perception analysis; TPACK;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:237-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.