IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v30y2022i1p666-675.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assertive speech acts of persuasion in English presidential election speeches

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Thanh Nguyen

    (University of Foreign Language Studies, The University of Danang)

Abstract

Politics is a process of making decisions by the distribution of power and resources in order to put certain political, economic and social ideas into practice. For political messages to be delivered to the target community through political discourse, many strategies have been employed to fulfill the purpose of persuading to the audience. The study investigates the assertive speech acts of persuasion utilized in Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election speeches. Adopting the speech act theory by Searle (1980), the study aims to uncover the features of assertive speech acts used by the two politicians for persuasion. The data was analyzed using descriptive qualitative method basing on quantitative information. The findings showed that the process of manipulation of the two politicians was fostered by assertive speech acts highlighting the illocutionary forces of asserting, affirming, avowing, denying, asserting not, and propounding. Through the illocutionary forces, both Trump and Clinton would like to communicate their different political stands and ideologies to persuade the audience to advocate them. Donald Trump spread his persuasion with more dominating frequencies of assertive speech acts than Hillary Clinton. Besides, they also demonstrated distinctively different illocutionary acts addressing different issues to serve their political purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Thanh Nguyen, 2022. "Assertive speech acts of persuasion in English presidential election speeches," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 666-675, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:666-675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/6227/2246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/6227
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    presidential election speeches; persuasive strategies; ideology; political discourse;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:30:y:2022:i:1:p:666-675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.