Author
Listed:
- Manotar Tampubolon
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Jhony Barimbing
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Dea Natalia
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Ghea Putri Anzanis
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Melandito Marakey
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Gladys Rossena
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Leonard Hendra Wijaya
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Niko Syahputra
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Petrus Roni Kristian
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
- Naomi Michelle
(Faculty of Law, Christian University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia)
Abstract
The role of an advocate is essential in providing legal aid to those in need, and their legitimate competence and professionalism are considered necessary. This is a descriptive method with statutory and conceptual underlying principles. Instead of constantly pursuing material for legal assistance, the advocate profession promotes ethical conduct in their duties as legal aid service providers. Every advocate is required to follow the Advocate's ethical standards. The moral and ethical trend of advocates includes submission to Almighty God, the Rule on Advocates, and their own Clients. As a result, the profession of advocate is known as an officium nobile, or a virtuous profession. Advocates must follow the Indonesian Advocates Code of Ethics, which includes sanctions for unethical behavior. According to the authors, Indonesian lawyers do not appear to follow an ethical code in their work. Several lawyers are facing lawsuits for violating ethical principles in the defense of their clients because there is a widespread misconception that an advocate can be prosecuted for criminal or civil law violations. This unprovable assertion breaks the law and also the doctrine of equal treatment under the law.
Suggested Citation
Manotar Tampubolon & Jhony Barimbing & Dea Natalia & Ghea Putri Anzanis & Melandito Marakey & Gladys Rossena & Leonard Hendra Wijaya & Niko Syahputra & Petrus Roni Kristian & Naomi Michelle, 2021.
"Advocates' Duties as Officium Nobile for Despicable Conduct: An Altruistic Outlook,"
Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 21(1), pages 853-861, July.
Handle:
RePEc:tec:journl:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:853-861
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:21:y:2021:i:1:p:853-861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.