Author
Abstract
The study was to assess the decision making practice in Queens College Administration. Participatory decision making offered valuable opportunities to focus on work activity, goals to identify, correct existing problems and to encourage better current and future satisfaction of job. Thus performance of the whole organization will be enhanced. Decision making is very crucial in the organization, because it gives new skill needed to perform their job effectively and develop a quality work force. This study about decision making practice on workers performance also discuses about benefit, approaches and methods of decision. The study were conducted by gathering information though reviewing related documents in addition to the main primary sources questionnaire both, open and closed ended questions that were distributed to all employees in the organization . The researcher used census techniques (100% of the total population of 48 employees of the College. These employees subjected to the study were employees of Queens College Administration who were managerial and non-managerial staffs. From 48 employee among these questioner six were not returned and six did not provide inconsistence information and 36 employees answered questioner that distribute through the researcher. After the desired information was gathered, it was analyzed precisely using tables, percentages and generalization. Generally more than half of the employees did not take part in the process of decision making. As a result this becomes a ground for employees are dissatisfaction and awe ring employees about the objective of taking part in decision making the respective bodies and give invaluable time aware them.
Suggested Citation
Alehegn, Derese Simegnew, 2021.
"Assessing decision making practice (in case of Queens College Adminstiration in Kality branch),"
Technium Business and Management, Technium Science, vol. 1(1), pages 30-65.
Handle:
RePEc:tec:busine:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:30-65
DOI: 10.47577/business.v1i1
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:busine:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:30-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.