IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tdt/annals/vxviiiy2012p368-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romania and the European Union budget, the integration costs and benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Ionela POPA
  • Dorina LUTA
  • Diana CODREANU

    (”Constantin Brancoveanu” University of Pitesti)

Abstract

Participation in an integrating group results in a series of more or less big changes in the participating states. EU conditionality is essentially an institutional arrangement, a rule, a standard of behaviour that allows the connection among the benefits of belonging to a regional economic group, such as the EU, in compliance with the requirements and principles imposed by membership. These adjustments entail costs for countries and the benefits derived from EU membership can be highlighted and maximized to the extent that there is a high degree of compatibility between the policies and institutional framework for the adoption of these policies at national level, on one hand, the policies and European institutional models adopting these policies, on the other. The present paper addresses the topic of operating plans designed to quantify the costs and benefits of Romania's EU accession in terms of value, highlighting its contribution to the EU budget on one hand, and its ability to access EU funds on the other hand.

Suggested Citation

  • Ionela POPA & Dorina LUTA & Diana CODREANU, 2012. "Romania and the European Union budget, the integration costs and benefits," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 368-372, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii:y:2012:p:368-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fse.tibiscus.ro/anale/Lucrari2012/kssue2012_055.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ondrej Schneider, 2007. "The EU Budget Dispute – A Blessing in Disguise?," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 57(7-8), pages 304-323, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hofreither, Markus F., 2007. "EU-Haushaltsreform und Agrarbudget - nationale Kofinanzierung als Lösungsansatz?," Discussion Papers DP-30-2007, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    2. van der Hoek, M. Peter, 2011. "European Union Finances," MPRA Paper 89953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Union Budget; costs; benefits;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H60 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - General
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii:y:2012:p:368-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Violeta Vasilescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fettiro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.