IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tdt/annals/vxviiiy2012p36-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The implications of chaos theory on Bucharest stock exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Felicia Ramona BIRAU

    (UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Chaos theory has generated a conceptual revolution regarding the analysis of capital markets. In general, capital market is an exciting and suitable field to apply chaos theory. Through its fundamental characteristics, an emerging capital market such as Bucharest Stock Exchange is even more appropriate. A chaotic system, as it is an emerging capital market presents certain characteristics such as : unpredictability, instability, disorder, noise and multiple vulnerabilities. By its very complex structure, an emerging capital market is a chaotic system. Chaos represents a state of complex, unpredictable, nonlinear dynamics. A chaotic system appears to be random when in fact is an evolved form of order. Chaos theory provides an explanation for the fact that complex and unpredictable results occur in dynamic systems behaviour due to seemingly insignificant changes in initial conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Felicia Ramona BIRAU, 2012. "The implications of chaos theory on Bucharest stock exchange," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 36-41, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii:y:2012:p:36-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fse.tibiscus.ro/RePEc/tdt/annals/pdf/004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Blackledge & Kieran Murphy, 2011. "Currency Trading Using the Fractal Market Hypothesis," Chapters, in: Giancarlo Nota (ed.), Risk Management Trends, IntechOpen.
    2. Linda P. Beckerman, 2000. "Application of complex systems science to systems engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(2), pages 96-102.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Park & T. P. Seager & P. S. C. Rao & M. Convertino & I. Linkov, 2013. "Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 356-367, March.
    2. George A. Polacek & David A. Gianetto & Khaldoun Khashanah & Dinesh Verma, 2012. "On principles and rules in complex adaptive systems: A financial system case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 433-447, December.
    3. Maroño, M. & Peña, J.A. & Santamaría, J., 2006. "The ‘PROCESO’ index: a new methodology for the evaluation of operational safety in the chemical industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 349-361.
    4. Marcus A. Bellamy & Rahul C. Basole, 2013. "Network analysis of supply chain systems: A systematic review and future research," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 235-249, June.
    5. Charles N. Calvano & Philip John, 2004. "Systems engineering in an age of complexity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 25-34.
    6. Tony Di Carlo & Behrokh Khoshnevis & Firdaus Udwadia, 2009. "Whole‐brain thinking in systems architecting," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 265-273, September.
    7. Jason E. Bartolomei & Daniel E. Hastings & Richard de Neufville & Donna H. Rhodes, 2012. "Engineering Systems Multiple‐Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large‐scale complex systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 41-61, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    chaos theory; random; determinism; initial conditions; chaotic time series; emerging capital markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii:y:2012:p:36-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Violeta Vasilescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fettiro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.