IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tdt/annals/vxviii-supplementy2012p264-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Approaches On Innovation Process In The Context Of Knowledge-Based Economy. Implications For Romanian Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • LUŢ DINA MARIA

    (“DIMITRIE CANTEMIR” CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY BUCHAREST, FACULTY OF TOURISTIC AND COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT TIMIŞOARA)

Abstract

In the knowledge-based economy the knowledge has become the essential factor of production, the key element of economic competitiveness at the organizational level, national and global level. Education, research and innovation form the so-called "knowledge triangle". In this triangle, the innovation is the key element with the greatest impact on welfare and also the most problematic in terms of the related policies. Unfortunately, most of the Romanian enterprises, especially the small and medium sized ones, have not the resources to support innovation process. For this reason, it was found that a viable innovation strategy is based on the combination of firms, participation in networks, alliances and collaborations in order to reduce costs ever higher of technology transfer. In recent years, such a combination is the business cluster. Starting from these considerations, the paper presents several aspects regarding the clustering process, as the best way of achieving competitiveness for Romanian enterprises, especially for the small and medium ones. The paper also highlights the main benefits of the clusters parts.

Suggested Citation

  • Luţ Dina Maria, 2012. "New Approaches On Innovation Process In The Context Of Knowledge-Based Economy. Implications For Romanian Enterprises," Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, Faculty of Economics, Tibiscus University in Timisoara, vol. 0, pages 264-271, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii/supplement:y:2012:p:264-271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fse.tibiscus.ro/anale/Lucrari2012_2/AnaleFSE_2012_2_040.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sternberg, Rolf, 2009. "Regional Dimensions of Entrepreneurship," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 5(4), pages 211-340, May.
    2. Udo Staber, 2001. "The Structure of Networks in Industrial Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 537-552, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Obschonka & Mingjie Zhou & Yixin Zhou & Jianxin Zhang & Rainer K. Silbereisen, 2019. "“Confucian” traits, entrepreneurial personality, and entrepreneurship in China: a regional analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 961-979, December.
    2. Eva Koisova & Jozef Habanik & Zuzana Virglerova & Zoltan Rozsa, 2017. "SMEs Financing as an Important Factor of Business Environment in Slovak Republic Regions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 129-140.
    3. Michael Fritsch & Korneliusz Pylak & Michael Wyrwich, 2019. "Persistence of Entrepreneurship in Different Historical Contexts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2019-003, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    4. Doloreux, David & Parto, Saeed, 2005. "Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 133-153.
    5. Kay, Rosemarie & Kranzusch, Peter & Nielen, Sebastian, 2022. "Auswirkungen der Corona-Pandemie auf das gewerbliche Gründungsgeschehen 2020: Eine regionale Analyse," Daten und Fakten 29, Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (IfM) Bonn.
    6. Ron Boschma & Ron Martin, 2010. "The Aims and Scope of Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. KANG Byeongwoo & MOTOHASHI Kazuyuki, 2020. "Local Industry Influence on Commercialization of University Research by University Startups," Discussion papers 20086, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Marco Savastano & Altaf Hussain Samo & Nisar Ahmed Channa & Carlo Amendola, 2022. "Toward a Conceptual Framework to Foster Green Entrepreneurship Growth in the Agriculture Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Michael Fritsch & Maria Kristalova & Michael Wyrwich, 2020. "Regional trajectories of entrepreneurship: the effect of socialism and transition," Jena Economics Research Papers 2020-010, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    10. Elsie Harper-Anderson & David A. Lewis, 2018. "What Makes Business Incubation Work? Measuring the Influence of Incubator Quality and Regional Capacity on Incubator Outcomes," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(1), pages 60-77, February.
    11. Albert Tchey Agbenyegah, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Rural Entrepreneurial Challenges: Towards Rural Economic Development and a Policy Framework," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(3), pages 58-71.
    12. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:129-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Alessandra Colombelli & Elena Grinza & Valentina Meliciani & Mariacristina Rossi, 2021. "Pulling Effects in Immigrant Entrepreneurship: Does Gender Matter?," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 97(1), pages 1-33, January.
    14. Pradhan, Jaya Prakash & Husain, Tareef, 2021. "Drivers of SME Formation in Indian States: The Empirics," MPRA Paper 25061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. László Szerb & Éva Komlósi & Balázs Páger, 2016. "Measuring Entrepreneurship and Optimizing Entrepreneurship Policy Efforts in the European Union," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 14(03), pages 08-23, October.
    16. repec:ces:ifodic:v:14:y:2016:i:3:p:19255694 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Leendertse, Jip & Schrijvers, Mirella & Stam, Erik, 2022. "Measure Twice, Cut Once: Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Metrics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(9).
    18. Giuliani, Elisa & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2014. "Social Network Analysis Methodologies for the Evaluation of Cluster Development Programs," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Udo Staber, 2008. "Network Evolution in Cultural Industries," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 569-578.
    20. Obschonka, Martin & Stuetzer, Michael & Gosling, Samuel D. & Rentfrow, Peter J. & Lamb, Michael E. & Potter, Jeff & Audretsch, David B., 2015. "Entrepreneurial Regions: Do Macro-psychological Cultural Characteristics of Regions help solve the “Knowledge Paradox” of Economics?," MPRA Paper 65323, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Mabel Pisá-Bó & José Fernando López-Muñoz & Josefina Novejarque-Civera, 2021. "The ever-changing socioeconomic conditions for entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1335-1355, September.
    22. Benedict C. Doepfer & André Habisch & Harald Pechlaner & Xenia-Isabel Poppe & Christoph Schwarz, 2016. "Entrepreneurship, shared values and the region - assessing the conditions for regional social performance of entrepreneurial behaviour," International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 36-56.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the knowledge-based economy; knowledge triangle; innovation system; business clusters; Romanian enterprises;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tdt:annals:v:xviii/supplement:y:2012:p:264-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Violeta Vasilescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fettiro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.