IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/yenvxx/v20y2015i1p89-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On bad terms: Problems and solutions within zooarchaeological bone surface modification studies

Author

Listed:
  • Emma C. James
  • Jessica C. Thompson

Abstract

The identification of butchery marks in the zooarchaeological record has consistently been debated. Much experimental work has been done to understand the causal agents behind some bone surface modifications, but recent controversies show that there is still no consensus. Terminology is not consistent between researchers, and there is ambiguity in how characteristics of marks are described and interpreted. There is also a lack of understanding of what causes individual variables within marks made by different agents, which is compounded by mark morphologies being described in terms that imply their causality. This paper examines these two problems in light of historic and current trends in the taphonomic literature, and recommends ways to describe marks that will facilitate more effective communication between researchers. It is proposed that greater standardisation within zooarchaeology is needed in seven key areas, and that this is the best avenue for moving into a new phase of taphonomic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma C. James & Jessica C. Thompson, 2015. "On bad terms: Problems and solutions within zooarchaeological bone surface modification studies," Environmental Archaeology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 89-103, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:89-103
    DOI: 10.1179/1749631414Y.0000000023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1179/1749631414Y.0000000023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1179/1749631414Y.0000000023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:89-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/yenv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.