IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/yenvxx/v18y2013i1p5-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Species identification of archaeological dung remains: A critical review of potential methods

Author

Listed:
  • Veerle Linseele
  • Heiko Riemer
  • Jan Baeten
  • Dirk De Vos
  • Elena Marinova
  • Claudio Ottoni

Abstract

Dung, macroscopically recognisable as such or not, can more commonly be found in archaeological contexts than is perhaps realised. Up to now, identification of dung to the species which produced it is usually either tenuous, or is not possible. However, species identification can be very informative and is necessary before any further studies can be conducted on the dung, for example on health and hygiene in the past and palaeoecology. This study presents a review of potential methods by which species identifications of archaeological dung can be undertaken. Criteria for identification can be divided into three broad categories: morphometric features of the dung; the content of dung and contextual evidence. Overall, the chances of a precise identification are high; however, a combination of different criteria and techniques will often be necessary to establish a secure identification. Moreover, preservation issues may exclude the application of some criteria while several criteria require more research and the expansion of reference collections of recent material. The overall aim is to move towards standardised methods for species identification of archaeological dung.

Suggested Citation

  • Veerle Linseele & Heiko Riemer & Jan Baeten & Dirk De Vos & Elena Marinova & Claudio Ottoni, 2013. "Species identification of archaeological dung remains: A critical review of potential methods," Environmental Archaeology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 5-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:18:y:2013:i:1:p:5-17
    DOI: 10.1179/1461410313Z.00000000019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1179/1461410313Z.00000000019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1179/1461410313Z.00000000019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:yenvxx:v:18:y:2013:i:1:p:5-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/yenv .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.