IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v118y2025i3p243-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting students’ engagement through (de)motivating teaching styles: A multi-perspective pilot approach

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Coterón
  • Alba González-Peño
  • Laura Martín-Hoz
  • Evelia Franco

Abstract

Students’ behavioral engagement in Physical Education (PE) has been suggested to be an important predictor of students’ performance and learning achievement at school, which can be also influenced by teachers’ way of interacting with their students. The aims of this study were to explore potential differences in the perceptions of motivating teaching styles by teachers, students, and observers; and to analyze the predictive role of the different perceptions on students’ behavioral engagement. A total of 7 PE teachers and 181 students taught by them participated. Validated questionnaires were administered to both students’ and teachers’, and two external observers analyzed a total of 52 5 min intervals taken from video recordings of PE classes. Findings suggested that teaching styles’ perceptions vary between teachers, students, and external observers, and they are students’ views which are more likely to predict students’ behavioral engagement. This study has relevant implication for future educational research aiming to explore teachers’ interactions.This study increases the understanding of the interplay between perceptions of teachers and students toward teaching behaviors among Physical Education teachers.Students’ perceptions of motivating teaching styles seem to act as a better predictor of students’ behavioral engagement.Perceptions of teachers and students differ from observers’ reports when analyzing teaching styles from circumplex approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Coterón & Alba González-Peño & Laura Martín-Hoz & Evelia Franco, 2025. "Predicting students’ engagement through (de)motivating teaching styles: A multi-perspective pilot approach," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(3), pages 243-256, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:3:p:243-256
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2025.2464010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2025.2464010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2025.2464010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:3:p:243-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.