IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vjerxx/v118y2025i1p51-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complex text and fluency: Evaluating the read like us protocol with third and fourth grade students

Author

Listed:
  • Jake Downs
  • Chase Young

Abstract

This matched-sample study investigates the use of a wide range of texts of varying–and often challenging–complexity to promote fluency for students experiencing below grade level achievement. We designed a repeated-reading protocol called ‘Read Like Us’, and performed a pilot implementation in small groups with third- and fourth-grade students (n = 174) who ranked ‘Below Benchmark’ or ‘Well Below Benchmark’ on the Acadience Reading assessment. Students engaged in the Read Like Us protocol with 50 texts over 50 instructional sessions with texts that averaged fifth grade complexity. Students in an active control group participated (n = 194) in the partnering school district’s typical intervention curriculum for students below benchmark in fluency. Propensity score matching, multilevel modeling, and effect sizes were used to determine the performance of the Read Like Us cohort relative to the active control condition. Outcomes revealed the Read Like Us condition experienced greater gains in words read per minute and passage reading accuracy than the active control. However, null results were found on standardized vocabulary and comprehension measures. These results suggest that a wide range of texts of varying complexity can be used to promote oral reading fluency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jake Downs & Chase Young, 2025. "Complex text and fluency: Evaluating the read like us protocol with third and fourth grade students," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 118(1), pages 51-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:1:p:51-62
    DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2024.2436875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220671.2024.2436875
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220671.2024.2436875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vjerxx:v:118:y:2025:i:1:p:51-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.