IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/vhimxx/v57y2024i2p100-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Counting question 20 on the 1870 census, the denial of the right to vote: Different tallies by the Census Office; the Minnesota Population Center; and Ancestry.com

Author

Listed:
  • James W. Oberly

Abstract

Question 20 on the 1870 US Census asked respondents if they had been denied the right to vote. The Census Office told Congress in 1871 that 40,800 men answered yes to the question. The Minnesota Population Center (MPC) one percent sample of the 1870 entries projected 29,900 affirmative answers. By contrast, Ancestry.com counted more than 125,000 ‘yes’ answers. The three tallies stem from different assumptions about how to enter data from the manuscript pages. Researchers using the MPC 1% sample and the Ancestry.com full count sample should be aware of the different assumptions about how to enter data. The differences also indicate a need for a fourth count that captures the complexity of the asking and answering of question 20.

Suggested Citation

  • James W. Oberly, 2024. "Counting question 20 on the 1870 census, the denial of the right to vote: Different tallies by the Census Office; the Minnesota Population Center; and Ancestry.com," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 100-122, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:57:y:2024:i:2:p:100-122
    DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2024.2368457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01615440.2024.2368457
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01615440.2024.2368457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:vhimxx:v:57:y:2024:i:2:p:100-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/vhim20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.