IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v64y2019i2p167-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The socioeconomic feasibility of greening rail stations: a case study in lisbon

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Matos Silva
  • Joana Serro
  • Patrícia Dinis Ferreira
  • Inês Teotónio

Abstract

Green roofs and living walls are considered effective solutions for improving the environmental integrity of urbanized areas and the overall performance of buildings. Proposals are emerging not just for buildings but also for existing transport infrastructures that have needs/problems that can be met or addressed by such solutions. However, the economic feasibility of such sustainable solutions has not yet been clarified. This study presents a methodological approach to performing cost–benefit analyses of greening urban transport infrastructures at the separate financial, economic, and socioenvironmental levels. Infrastructure, user, and environmental dimensions are also assessed. Whole life cycle costs and socioenvironmental benefits are considered together. The methodology is applied to one of the main stations in Lisbon, Portugal: Entrecampos Railway Station. Five different case study alternatives for the station’s retrofit with green infrastructures are compared to its current situation. The cost–benefit analysis demonstrated that all five greening alternatives are economically feasible. For a 50-year life cycle and a 3.36% discount rate, the net present value ranged between EUR 734,700 and EUR 7,733,279. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, revealing a high degree of influence of discount and inflation rates, recreation, aesthetics improvement, well-being, and the station noise reduction on the net present value, ranging from 1.5 to 9%.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Matos Silva & Joana Serro & Patrícia Dinis Ferreira & Inês Teotónio, 2019. "The socioeconomic feasibility of greening rail stations: a case study in lisbon," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(2), pages 167-190, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:64:y:2019:i:2:p:167-190
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2018.1470272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1470272
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1470272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inês Teotónio & Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Cristina Matos Silva & José Morais, 2020. "Investing in Sustainable Built Environments: The Willingness to Pay for Green Roofs and Green Walls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Jaime Larumbe, 2021. "Measuring Customer Reservation Price for Maintenance, Repair and Operations of the Metro Public Transport System in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Shoshanna Saxe & Dena Kasraian, 2020. "Rethinking environmental LCA life stages for transport infrastructure to facilitate holistic assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(5), pages 1031-1046, October.
    4. Teotónio, Inês & Oliveira Cruz, Carlos & Matos Silva, Cristina & Lopes, Rodrigo Ferreira Reis, 2023. "Bridging CBA and MCA for evaluating green infrastructure: Proposal of a new evaluation model (MAGICA)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Tate, Christopher & Tran, Ngan & Longo, Alberto & Barry, John & Taylor, Tim & O'Neill, Ciaran & Hunter, Ruth, 2024. "Economic evaluations of urban green and blue space interventions: A scoping review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:64:y:2019:i:2:p:167-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.