IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/usppxx/v10y2023i1p2190368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence and Propagation of Fake News

Author

Listed:
  • Banafsheh Behzad
  • Bhavana Bheem
  • Daniela Elizondo
  • Susan Martonosi

Abstract

In recent years, scholars have raised concerns on the effects that unreliable news, or “fake news,” has on our political sphere, and our democracy as a whole. For example, the propagation of fake news on social media is widely believed to have influenced the outcome of national elections, including the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. What drives the propagation of fake news on an individual level, and which interventions could effectively reduce the propagation rate? Our model disentangles bias from truthfulness of an article and examines the relationship between these two parameters and a reader’s own beliefs. Using the model, we create policy recommendations for both social media platforms and individual social media users to reduce the spread of untruthful or highly biased news. We recommend that platforms sponsor unbiased truthful news, focus fact-checking efforts on mild to moderately biased news, recommend friend suggestions across the political spectrum, and provide users with reports about the political alignment of their feed. We recommend that individual social media users fact check news that strongly aligns with their political belief and read articles of opposing political bias. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Banafsheh Behzad & Bhavana Bheem & Daniela Elizondo & Susan Martonosi, 2023. "Prevalence and Propagation of Fake News," Statistics and Public Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2190368-219, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2190368
    DOI: 10.1080/2330443X.2023.2190368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2330443X.2023.2190368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2330443X.2023.2190368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:2190368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uspp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.