IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/urecxx/v5y2024i2p164-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rooted resistance: The struggle for Black liberation through food cultivation

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren Forbes

Abstract

In U.S. cities, distinct regions of wealth and poverty structure the distribution of political power and public resources along racial lines. Black-led urban farms resist these inequitable conditions by using food cultivation as a tool of community resilience building and power shifting. In this study, I propose a framework to describe the roles of Black-led urban farms within low-income Black communities. I assess this framework using a comparative case study and semi-structured interviews with Black urban farmers in Atlanta, Georgia; Detroit, Michigan; and Portland, Oregon. Findings suggest that Black-led urban farms advance Black community survival and wellbeing by instilling local Black placemaking, fostering personal and racial healing, and resisting racial capitalism. I conclude that Black-led urban farms function as “compass institutions” and generate social value that benefits their respective cities. I provide policy recommendations for local governments and prospective funders seeking to advance the social impact of these farms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren Forbes, 2024. "Rooted resistance: The struggle for Black liberation through food cultivation," Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 164-190, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:164-190
    DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2023.2279313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26884674.2023.2279313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26884674.2023.2279313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:164-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/urec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.