IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/urecxx/v4y2023i1p27-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of police violence on citizen calls for service: The killing of Samuel DuBose in Cincinnati, Ohio

Author

Listed:
  • Roderick L. Pearson
  • Jeffrey M. Timberlake

Abstract

Research on the impact of police violence on citizens’ willingness to call the police has yielded mixed results, with some studies finding strong effects and others finding none. We contribute to this literature by examining whether calls for service declined in the aftermath of the killing of Samuel DuBose by a University of Cincinnati Police Department officer in 2015. We employ an interrupted time series design, treating the DuBose killing as an exogenous shock that may have altered the trend in calls for service from 2014 to 2016. We gathered data on 911 calls and crime incidents from the Cincinnati Police Department, to which we appended block group-level demographic data from the American Community Survey. We find a substantial unconditional effect of DuBose’s killing on the level of calls for service in all neighborhoods, especially in majority Black neighborhoods. The size of these effects is reduced substantially after introducing controls; nevertheless, the effect of the DuBose killing is still significant in calls for service in all block groups and for majority Black block groups. We conclude by calling for increased research on the community-level impacts of police violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Roderick L. Pearson & Jeffrey M. Timberlake, 2023. "Effects of police violence on citizen calls for service: The killing of Samuel DuBose in Cincinnati, Ohio," Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 27-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:27-48
    DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2022.2117111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26884674.2022.2117111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26884674.2022.2117111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:27-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/urec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.