IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/urecxx/v2y2021i2p183-209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sixteen miles: New users, stock dealers, and racialization in small cities

Author

Listed:
  • Brittany Lee Frederick
  • Heather Mooney

Abstract

This study examines how proximate small cities in the United States that have similar socioeconomic backgrounds, disproportionately high rates of opioid overdose, but different racial demographics, narrate local experiences of the opioid epidemic. Using critical discourse analysis, we analyzed 251 local news articles from Lawrence and Lowell, Massachusetts. This comparative study highlights the racialization of space and the racializing power of space in two small city newspapers: the Eagle Tribune and the Lowell Sun. We demonstrate how (White) criminality is made sympathetic through White death, and how space is employed as a multi-valiant mechanism of colorblind racialization. We theorize the construction of a distorted and racialized “supply chain,” featuring narratives of “stock dealers” from “source cities” moving drugs into predominately White “receiver cities” populated by vulnerable “new users,” employing and producing space as a racialized frame. Ultimately, we map how familiar racialization and novel decriminalization is produced in/by local news media.

Suggested Citation

  • Brittany Lee Frederick & Heather Mooney, 2021. "Sixteen miles: New users, stock dealers, and racialization in small cities," Journal of Race, Ethnicity and the City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 183-209, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:183-209
    DOI: 10.1080/26884674.2021.1908099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26884674.2021.1908099
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26884674.2021.1908099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:urecxx:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:183-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/urec .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.