IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v63y2025i2p558-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Formalization of annual performance feedback and employees’ job satisfaction in the SME context

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Guenther
  • Sebastian Lehnen
  • Rainer Michael Rilke

Abstract

Human resource management (HRM) practices in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to increase employees’ job satisfaction are on the rise. Given that SMEs often adopt highly formalized HRM practices of large companies, for example, in the case of annual performance appraisals, we investigate the relationship between the degree of formalization of annual performance feedback and employees’ job satisfaction in the SME context. Using an experimental survey study design (N = 166) in a German SME, we find that employees receiving annual performance feedback with a high degree of formalization report lower job satisfaction directly after the annual performance feedback than those who are still to receive their feedback. In contrast, in the case of annual performance feedback with a low degree of formalization, employees report higher job satisfaction right after the annual performance feedback than employees before the feedback. Moreover, we find that employees’ feedback orientation is an important moderator in this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Guenther & Sebastian Lehnen & Rainer Michael Rilke, 2025. "Formalization of annual performance feedback and employees’ job satisfaction in the SME context," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(2), pages 558-589, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:558-589
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2024.2326576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2024.2326576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2024.2326576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:558-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.