IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v62y2024i6p2847-2905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SME default prediction: A systematic methodology-focused review

Author

Listed:
  • Hamid Cheraghali
  • Peter Molnár

Abstract

This study reviews the methodologies used in the literature to predict failure in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). We identified 145 SMEs’ default prediction studies from 1972 to early 2023. We summarized the methods used in each study. The focus points are estimation methods, sample re-balancing methods, variable selection techniques, validation methods, and variables included in the literature. More than 1,200 factors used in failure prediction models have been identified, along with 54 unique feature selection techniques and 80 unique estimation methods. Over one-third of the studies do not use any feature selection method, and more than one-quarter use only in-sample validation. Our main recommendation for researchers is to use feature selection and validate results using hold-out samples or cross-validation. As an avenue for further research, we suggest in-depth empirical comparisons of estimation methods, feature selection techniques, and sample re-balancing methods based on some large and commonly used datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamid Cheraghali & Peter Molnár, 2024. "SME default prediction: A systematic methodology-focused review," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(6), pages 2847-2905, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:6:p:2847-2905
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2023.2277426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2023.2277426
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2023.2277426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:6:p:2847-2905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.