IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v62y2024i6p2741-2778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the moderated impact of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and entrepreneurial marketing on firm performance

Author

Listed:
  • Nasser Alqahtani
  • Can Uslay
  • Sengun (Shen) Yeniyurt

Abstract

This study examines the relative efficacy of entrepreneurial orientation (EO), market orientation (MO), and entrepreneurial marketing (EM) as moderated by various environmental and organizational factors including firm size. Using structural equation modeling and representative cross-sectional data of small, mid-sized, and large firms from the United States, the research finds that EO outperforms EM and MO in conditions of low competitive intensity, low market growth, and high supplier power. EO is also most viable for small firms, and those with smaller and less diverse networks. In contrast, MO performs best for large firms, and firms with diverse and strong networks, operating in high growth, low turbulence markets, and when supplier power is low. Finally, EM excels under conditions of high market turbulence, competitive intensity, and supplier power, for mid-sized firms, and firms with low network strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasser Alqahtani & Can Uslay & Sengun (Shen) Yeniyurt, 2024. "Comparing the moderated impact of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, and entrepreneurial marketing on firm performance," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(6), pages 2741-2778, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:6:p:2741-2778
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2023.2272267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2023.2272267
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2023.2272267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:6:p:2741-2778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.