IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v62y2024i5p2287-2321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clearing the hurdles: Revisiting the under-performance hypothesis for women-led VC funded firms

Author

Listed:
  • Candida G. Brush
  • Amanda B. Elam

Abstract

This study revisits the female underperformance hypothesis by investigating the influence of CEO gender on key performance factors for VC funded firms from 2011–2016. We used a matched case-control sample approach to reduce the confounding influence of industry sector on gender differences for four key performance outcomes – total capital, raised total rounds of funding, successful exit or business failure. Results show gender does not predict funding raised or firm performance, and that key legitimacy markers, including elite education, external endorsement and high-status investors, offset potential gender discounts for women-led firms. Implications are that the female underperformance hypothesis should not be perpetuated as a legitimizing myth or stereotype predicting performance of women entrepreneurs in management studies. In practice, VCs should not rule out investments or expect poor performance based on CEO gender.

Suggested Citation

  • Candida G. Brush & Amanda B. Elam, 2024. "Clearing the hurdles: Revisiting the under-performance hypothesis for women-led VC funded firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(5), pages 2287-2321, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:5:p:2287-2321
    DOI: 10.1080/00472778.2023.2229868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00472778.2023.2229868
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00472778.2023.2229868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:62:y:2024:i:5:p:2287-2321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.