IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ujbmxx/v39y2001i2p139-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Learning: An Empirical Assessment of Process in Small U.K. Manufacturing Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ians Chaston
  • Beryl Badger
  • Eugene Sadler‐smith

Abstract

Organizational learning is increasingly being mentioned in the literature as a mechanism for assisting small firm survival. There exists, however, limited empirical evidence to validate the benefits claimed for the concept. A survey of small U.K. manufacturing firms was undertaken to ascertain whether entrepreneurial firms use higher‐order (or double‐loop) learning. Additional research aims included assessing whether organizational learning confers information management advantages and contributes to the upgrading of managerial competencies. The results suggest entrepreneurial firms do utilize higher‐order learning and are able to manage information more effectively than non‐entrepreneurial firms. Some evidence was found to support the view that higher‐order learning influences certain managerial competencies. The implications of these findings are discussed and proposals presented on the needs for further research

Suggested Citation

  • Ians Chaston & Beryl Badger & Eugene Sadler‐smith, 2001. "Organizational Learning: An Empirical Assessment of Process in Small U.K. Manufacturing Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 139-151, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:39:y:2001:i:2:p:139-151
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-627X.00013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1540-627X.00013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-627X.00013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ujbmxx:v:39:y:2001:i:2:p:139-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ujbm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.