Author
Listed:
- Ashley L. Podhradsky
- Kevin Streff
Abstract
There are several empirical studies that have focused on the analysis of retired digital media on the secondary market. Gutmann highlighted data remanence in semiconductor devices, specifically disk drives, Garfinkel and Shelat, researchers from MIT conducted a study, “Remembrance of Data Passed: A Study of Disk Sanitization Practices, “ and Jones, et al have an ongoing research project initiated in 200. In the research studies listed above, they all identified sanitization issues with used media. All of their research had a historical impact on not only the technology community but the business community alike.This research paper is focused on taking data remanence a step further to analyze residual data on sanitized media within the secondary market. Prior research was analyzing any discarded media, this research aims to acquire drives in which due diligence has been taken to ensure data privacy. The specific research question this research will address is how effective is current data sanitization practices within key, regulated industries. Furthermore, if residual data is found, is there enough data available to comprise an identity. The researchers theorize that current practices are ineffective and private data of innocent individuals is being comprised.This research will introduce the Digital Forensics Recovery (DFDR) study, where five key industries-government, education, businesses, electronic recycle centers, and individual home users were targeted to test effectiveness of data sanitization practices with used media. This paper will report the case study findings while outlining future work for the study. Furthermore, this study seeks to bring the issue of liability and ownership of discarded data to light.
Suggested Citation
Ashley L. Podhradsky & Kevin Streff, 2011.
"Testing Data Sanitization Practices of Retired Drives with The Digital Forensics Data Recovery Project,"
Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 46-63, July.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:46-63
DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2011.10855917
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:7:y:2011:i:3:p:46-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.