IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uipsxx/v3y2007i3p45-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Sharing in Law Enforcement: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rahul Bhaskar
  • Yi Zhang

Abstract

Previous research has mainly focused on knowledge management. This paper seeks to fill the gaps in understanding factors that influence knowledge sharing within law enforcement. The authors take an in-depth, case search approach focusing specifically on the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. A total of 30 interviews were conducted with law enforcement executives, investigators and other officers in the task force units. This study reveals that successful knowledge sharing requires attention to individual, organizational, and technological factors in a law enforcement organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahul Bhaskar & Yi Zhang, 2007. "Knowledge Sharing in Law Enforcement: A Case Study," Journal of Information Privacy and Security, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 45-68, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:45-68
    DOI: 10.1080/15536548.2007.10855821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15536548.2007.10855821
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15536548.2007.10855821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Bell & Mitchell Congram, 2014. "Communication Interception Technology (CIT) and Its Use in the Fight against Transnational Organised Crime (TOC) in Australia: A Review of the Literature," International Journal of Social Science Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 46-66, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uipsxx:v:3:y:2007:i:3:p:45-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uips .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.