Author
Listed:
- Boyuan Zhang
- Yu Liu
- Shaomin Wu
Abstract
Most engineered systems intend to perform missions with a pre-specified target success probability to reduce undesirable failure risks. Before executing the next mission, inspection activities are conducted across various physical levels for assessing the probability of mission success. However, due to the randomness of a system’s degradation behavior and the presence of measurement errors, inspection results inevitably contain uncertainty. Meanwhile, mission durations and acceptable system states may also be uncertain, due to uncontrollable factors, such as random operating environments and mission demands. In such a circumstance, it is of great significance to identify the optimal multilevel inspection policy to answer, as great confident as possible, the question that the system can complete the next mission with a target mission success probability. This paper develops a novel metric to gauge the effectiveness of a multilevel inspection policy to assess if the system can complete the next mission with a pre-specified target success probability from a risk-averse perspective, based on which an optimization method is proposed to seek an inspection policy under uncertain scenarios with the aim of minimizing the maximum regret of the proposed metric. A stochastic fractal search algorithm, along with two tailored local search rules, is designed to efficiently resolve the resulting optimization problem. Two cases, including a three-component system and a rocket fueling mechanism’s control system, are used to illustrate the efficacy of the proposed approach, which is capable of effectively identifying the risk of mission failures by inspection policies.
Suggested Citation
Boyuan Zhang & Yu Liu & Shaomin Wu, 2025.
"Inspection policy optimization for hierarchical multistate systems under uncertain mission scenarios: A risk-averse perspective,"
IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 213-229, February.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:57:y:2025:i:2:p:213-229
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2024.2322695
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:57:y:2025:i:2:p:213-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.