Author
Abstract
Machine learning for additive manufacturing (ML4AM) has emerged as a viable strategy in recent years to enhance 3D printing performance. However, the amount of data required for model training and the lack of ability to infer AM process insights can be serious barriers for black-box learning methods. Due to the nature of low-volume fabrication of infinite product variety in AM, ML4AM also faces “small data, big tasks” challenges to learn heterogeneous point cloud data and control the quality of new designs. To address these challenges, this work establishes an impulse response formulation of layer-wise AM processes to relate design inputs with the deformed final products. To enable prescriptive learning from a small sample of printed parts with different 3D shapes, we develop a fabrication-aware input–output representation, where each product is constructed by a large amount of basic shap primitives. The impulse response model depicts how the 2D shape primitives (circular sectors, line segments, and corner segments) in each layer are stacked up to become final 3D shape primitives. A geometric quality of a new design can therefore be predicted through the construction of learned shape primitives. Essentially, the small-sample learning of printed products is transformed into a large-sample learning of printed shape primitives under the impulse response formulation of AM. This fabrication-aware formulation builds the foundation for applying well-established control theory to the intelligent quality control in AM. It not only provides theoretical underpinning and justification of our previous work, but also enable new opportunities in ML4AM. As an example, it leads to transfer function characterization of AM processes to uncover process insights. It also provides block-diagram representation of AM processes to design and optimize the control of AM quality.
Suggested Citation
Qiang Huang, 2023.
"An impulse response formulation for small-sample learning and control of additive manufacturing quality,"
IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(9), pages 926-939, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:9:p:926-939
DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2113186
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2023:i:9:p:926-939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.