IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v55y2022i2p172-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A PageRank-like measure for evaluating process flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Fengming Cui
  • Chen Wang
  • Lefei Li

Abstract

Uncertainty has always been a threat to system performance in both manufacturing and service industries. Although cost-budgeting may limit available resources, a more flexible structure can still improve the system’s ability to deal with uncertainty. In this study, we develop a new measure to help find a more flexible structure without extensive simulation. We create a PageRank-analogous score whereby we can calculate the Flexibility Gap (FG) index to predict the better of two alternative structures with topological information only. We theoretically analyze how the FG index recognizes flexible sparse structures such as expander graphs with high expansion ratios. Numerical experiments show that the FG index is effective in ranking the flexibility performance of different structures in terms of average waiting time and expected lost sales. Moreover, we extend the FG index with minimal modification to accommodate the case of imperfect flexibility (i.e., flexible suppliers with shrinking capacities) and demonstrate that the generalized FG index is still a good predictor of expected lost sales. Our approach provides a novel view to explain flexibility. That is, sparse structures with higher graph expansion ratios disperse the demand fluctuation more “rapidly” among resources to cushion the shock of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengming Cui & Chen Wang & Lefei Li, 2022. "A PageRank-like measure for evaluating process flexibility," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(2), pages 172-186, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2022:i:2:p:172-186
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2021.2010152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2021.2010152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2021.2010152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:55:y:2022:i:2:p:172-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.