IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v54y2022i9p881-893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal budget allocation for stochastic simulation with importance sampling: Exploration vs. replication

Author

Listed:
  • Young Myoung Ko
  • Eunshin Byon

Abstract

This article investigates a budget allocation problem for optimally running stochastic simulation models with importance sampling in computer experiments. In particular, we consider a two-level (or nested) simulation to estimate the expectation of the simulation output, where the first-level draws random input samples and the second-level obtains the output given the input from the first-level. The two-level simulation faces the trade-off in allocating the computational budgets: exploring more inputs (exploration) or exploiting the stochastic response surface at a sampled point in more detail (replication). We study an appropriate computational budget allocation strategy that strikes a balance between exploration and replication to minimize the variance of the estimator when importance sampling is employed at the first-level simulation. Our analysis suggests that exploration can be beneficial than replication in many practical situations. We also conduct numerical experiments in a wide range of settings and wind turbine case study to investigate the trade-off.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Myoung Ko & Eunshin Byon, 2022. "Optimal budget allocation for stochastic simulation with importance sampling: Exploration vs. replication," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 881-893, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:9:p:881-893
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2021.1953197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2021.1953197
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2021.1953197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:54:y:2022:i:9:p:881-893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.