IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v52y2020i4p432-443.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximation algorithms for scheduling C-benevolent jobs on weighted machines

Author

Listed:
  • Ge Yu
  • Sheldon H. Jacobson

Abstract

This article considers a new variation of the online interval scheduling problem, which consists of scheduling C-benevolent jobs on multiple heterogeneous machines with different positive weights. The reward for completing a job assigned to a machine is given by the product of the job value and the machine weight. The objective of this scheduling problem is to maximize the total reward for completed jobs. Two classes of approximation algorithms are analyzed, Cooperative Greedy algorithms and Prioritized Greedy algorithms, with competitive ratios provided. We show that when the weight ratios between machines are small, the Cooperative Greedy algorithm outperforms the Prioritized Greedy algorithm. As the weight ratios increase, the Prioritized Greedy algorithm outperforms the Cooperative Greedy algorithm. Moreover, as the weight ratios approach infinity, the competitive ratio of the Prioritized Greedy algorithm approaches four. We also provide a lower bound of 3/2 and 9/7 for the competitive ratio of any deterministic algorithm for scheduling C-benevolent jobs on two and three machines with arbitrary weights, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge Yu & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2020. "Approximation algorithms for scheduling C-benevolent jobs on weighted machines," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(4), pages 432-443, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:432-443
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2019.1657606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2019.1657606
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2019.1657606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:52:y:2020:i:4:p:432-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.