IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v48y2016i6p527-540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation race under revenue and technology uncertainty of heterogeneous firms where the winner does not take all

Author

Listed:
  • Taner Bilgiç
  • Refik Güllü

Abstract

We analyze the competitive investment behavior on innovative products or services under revenue and technology uncertainty for heterogenous firms. Firms make a decision on how much to invest in research and development of an innovative technology at the beginning of the time horizon. They discover the technology at an uncertain time in the future. The time of successful discovery depends on the amount of investment and the characteristics of the firms. All firms collect revenues even though they are not winners. Although there can be positive or negative external shocks, the potential revenue rates decrease in time and the first firm to adopt the technology is less prone to negative shocks and benefits more from positive shocks. Therefore, the competition is a stochastic race, where all firms collect some revenue once they adopt. We show the existence of a pure strategy Nash equilibrium for this game in a duopoly market under general assumptions and provide more structural results when the time to successfully innovate is exponentially distributed. We show the uniqueness of the equilibrium for an arbitrary number of symmetric firms. We argue that for sufficiently efficient firms who are resilient against market shocks, consolidating racing firms will decrease their expected profits. We also provide an illustrative computational analysis for comparative statics, where we show the non-monotonic behavior of equilibrium investment levels as examples. It appears that the equilibrium investment level behavior in innovation can be highly dependent on firm characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Taner Bilgiç & Refik Güllü, 2016. "Innovation race under revenue and technology uncertainty of heterogeneous firms where the winner does not take all," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 527-540, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:6:p:527-540
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1110651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1110651
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1110651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pelin G. Canbolat & Uriel G. Rothblum, 2019. "Constant risk aversion in stochastic contests with exponential completion times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(1), pages 4-14, February.
    2. Jinglve Wang & Hongping Yuan, 2023. "Deciphering the Innovation Subsidy Puzzle: Government Choices amid Supply Chain Encroachment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-38, November.
    3. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2022. "The optimal green strategies for competitive ocean carriers under potential regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 840-856.
    4. Zheng, Wei & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping & Li, Yanran, 2023. "Innovative development strategy of a risk-averse firm considering product unreliability under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    5. Qi Jun & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Stochastic hybrid decision‐making based on interval type 2 fuzzy sets for measuring the innovation capacities of financial institutions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 573-593, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:6:p:527-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.