Author
Listed:
- Liwen Ouyang
- Daniel W. Apley
- Sanjay Mehrotra
Abstract
Controlled trials are ubiquitously used to investigate the effect of a medical treatment. The trial outcome can be dependent on a set of patient covariates. Traditional approaches have relied primarily on randomized patient sampling and allocation to treatment and control groups. However, when covariate data for a large set of patients are available and the dependence of the outcome on the covariates is of interest, one can potentially design treatment/control groups that provide better estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment or provide similarly accurate estimates with a smaller trial cohort size. In this article, we develop an approach that uses optimal Design Of Experiments (DOE) concepts to select the patients for the treatment and control groups upfront, based on their covariate values, in a manner that optimizes the information content in the data. For the optimal treatment and control groups selection, we develop simple guidelines and an optimization algorithm that achieves much more accurate estimates of the covariate-dependent effects of the treatment than random sampling. We demonstrate the advantage of our method through both theoretical and numerical performance comparisons. The advantages are more pronounced when the trial cohort size is smaller, relative to the number of records in the database. Moreover, our approach causes no sampling bias in the estimated effects, for the same reason that DOE principles do not bias estimated effects. Although we focus on medical treatment assessment, the approach has applicability in many analytics application domains where one wants to conduct a controlled experimental study to identify the covariate-dependent effects of a factor (e.g., a marketing sales promotion), based on a sample of study subjects selected optimally from a large database of covariates.
Suggested Citation
Liwen Ouyang & Daniel W. Apley & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2016.
"Designed sampling from large databases for controlled trials,"
IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1087-1097, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:12:p:1087-1097
DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189633
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:48:y:2016:i:12:p:1087-1097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.