IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v46y2014i10p1079-1092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Drop fragility of the display of a smart mobile phone: weakest link failure or cumulative shock failure?

Author

Listed:
  • Minsu Kim
  • Suk Joo Bae

Abstract

It is not unusual for portable devices to be damaged when they are accidentally dropped on hard floors. Shock tests are increasingly being used to evaluate the drop impact response of portable devices. However, the underlying failure mechanisms have not been fully theoretically explored. There are two candidate failure mechanisms that can account for the drop impact fragility of the display in a smart mobile phone during a shock test: weakest link failure and cumulative damage failure. The weakest link theory provides a basis on a Weibull distribution and the cumulative damage theory on an inverse Gaussian distribution. This article proposes a discrimination procedure for the two distribution types. The probability of correct selection is computed using asymptotic results on the ratio of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) to discriminate between the two distributions. Expressions are provided that can be used to compute the asymptotic distributions of ML estimators or their functions when there is model mis-specification. The proposed method is applied to real shock test data for smart mobile phone display modules to determine the underlying failure mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Minsu Kim & Suk Joo Bae, 2014. "Drop fragility of the display of a smart mobile phone: weakest link failure or cumulative shock failure?," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(10), pages 1079-1092, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:46:y:2014:i:10:p:1079-1092
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2014.882039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2014.882039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2014.882039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:46:y:2014:i:10:p:1079-1092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.