IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v45y2013i7p736-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient computing budget allocation for finding simplest good designs

Author

Listed:
  • Qing-Shan Jia
  • Enlu Zhou
  • Chun-Hung Chen

Abstract

In many applications some designs are easier to implement, require less training data and shorter training time, and consume less storage than others. Such designs are called simple designs and are usually preferred over complex ones when they all have good performance. Despite the abundant existing studies on how to find good designs in simulation-based optimization, there exist few studies on finding simplest good designs. This article considers this important problem and the following contributions are made to the subject. First, lower bounds are provided for the probabilities of correctly selecting the m simplest designs with top performance and selecting the best m such simplest good designs, respectively. Second, two efficient computing budget allocation methods are developed to find m simplest good designs and to find the best m such designs, respectively, and their asymptotic optimalities have been shown. Third, the performance of the two methods is compared with equal allocations over six academic examples and a smoke detection problem in a wireless sensor network.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing-Shan Jia & Enlu Zhou & Chun-Hung Chen, 2013. "Efficient computing budget allocation for finding simplest good designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(7), pages 736-750.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:736-750
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.705454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2012.705454
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2012.705454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:7:p:736-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.