IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v45y2013i3p291-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient simulation budget allocation with regression

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Brantley
  • Loo Lee
  • Chun-Hung Chen
  • Argon Chen

Abstract

Simulation can be a very powerful tool to help decision making in many applications; however, exploring multiple courses of actions can be time consuming. Numerous Ranking & Selection (R&S) procedures have been developed to enhance the simulation efficiency of finding the best design. This article explores the potential of further enhancing R&S efficiency by incorporating simulation information from across the domain into a regression metamodel. This article assumes that the underlying function to be optimized is one-dimensional as well as approximately quadratic or piecewise quadratic. Under some common conditions in most regression-based approaches, the proposed method provides approximations of the optimal rules that determine the design locations to conduct simulation runs and the number of samples allocated to each design location. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed approach can dramatically enhance efficiency over existing efficient R&S methods and can obtain significant savings over regression-based methods. In addition to utilizing concepts from the Design Of Experiments (DOE) literature, it introduces the probability of correct selection optimality criterion that underpins our new R&S method to the DOE literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Brantley & Loo Lee & Chun-Hung Chen & Argon Chen, 2013. "Efficient simulation budget allocation with regression," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 291-308.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:291-308
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.712238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2012.712238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2012.712238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:45:y:2013:i:3:p:291-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.