IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v43y2011i8p547-565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effectiveness of sequential aviation security screening policies

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Lee
  • Sheldon Jacobson

Abstract

Passenger and baggage screening is an essential component of aviation security systems designed to detect and remove threats endangering the safety of air transportation. Upon entering the security checkpoint, passengers are assigned to a multilevel security class system defined by sets of screening devices. The sequential passenger assignment problem has been formulated as a stochastic process, with the objective of maximizing the overall true alarm rate, subject to device capacity constraints. This article introduces three metrics for evaluating the performance of sequential passenger assignment policies with respect to the retrospective optimal solution. The concepts of under-screening and over-screening passengers are defined, from which expressions for the expectation and variance of the number of under-screened passengers are obtained in part through a Markov chain. A conditional probability inequality is used to develop an upper bound on attaining the set of optimal assignments for a given realization of passenger risk. Estimators for the performance metrics are presented for the efficient simulation of cases involving a large number of passenger assignments. The key result is that for populations containing a majority of low-risk passengers, an initial underestimation of the overall risk level produces fewer under-screened passengers in comparison to that which results if the true risk level lies below what was anticipated. Furthermore, fewer passengers are incorrectly assigned to undergo the appropriate screening intensity if security class capacities are biased toward screening the majority of low-risk passengers using a combination of low-intensity detection devices, while reserving the high-intensity, time-consuming devices for the limited number of high-risk passengers.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Lee & Sheldon Jacobson, 2011. "Evaluating the effectiveness of sequential aviation security screening policies," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 547-565.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:43:y:2011:i:8:p:547-565
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2010.550909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2010.550909
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2010.550909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nie, Xiaofeng, 2019. "The impact of conditional dependence on checked baggage screening," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 883-893.
    2. Yan, Xihong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Optimal placement of multiple types of detectors under a small vessel attack threat to port security," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 71-94.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:43:y:2011:i:8:p:547-565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.