IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v43y2011i11p773-782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Component and system burn-in for repairable systems

Author

Listed:
  • Kyungmee Kim
  • Way Kuo

Abstract

From the system viewpoint there are at least two options to screen out defective components. First, components undergo burn-in for various times before they are placed together in a system, which is called component burn-in. Second, systems face burn-in after being assembled from components, called system burn-in. This article compares these two options for repairable systems. System reliability and rate of occurrence of system failures are used as the criteria for comparisons. To model successive system failures during system burn-in, two common types of repair are considered: component replacement and minimal repair. For each repair type analytical results are obtained that show that both component and system burn-in have a positive impact on the criteria, with component burn-in outperforming system burn-in. These results are obtained under the assumption that each component in a system has a decreasing failure rate distribution.Accepted in 2005 for a special issue on Reliability co-edited by Hoang Pham, Rutgers University; Dong Ho Pak, Hallym University, Korea; and Richard Cassady, University of Arkansas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyungmee Kim & Way Kuo, 2011. "Component and system burn-in for repairable systems," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 773-782.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:43:y:2011:i:11:p:773-782
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2011.590432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2011.590432
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2011.590432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:43:y:2011:i:11:p:773-782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.