Author
Listed:
- Chester Chambers
- Panos Kouvelis
- Ping Su
Abstract
This work considers the adoption of technology that will reduce unit production costs by one or two players sharing a single market. Three models are developed involving a monopolist, a Stackelberg game with two firms and a designated order of adoption, and an open loop game with no prespecified order of adoption. In the “two-firm” cases the firms are allowed to differ in per unit production costs both before and after technology adoption, as well as the capital outlay required for adoption. In each setting, an evolution of market size is manifested by the level of an exogenous parameter which evolves according to geometric Brownian motion. Structural and numerical results are presented that help to explain the logic and optimal timing of technology adoption. The inclusion of cost and investment level asymmetry leads to a variety of cases. In some instances the high-cost firm is the first to adopt, and adopts at the point that maximizes its profits. In other cases, the higher-cost firm is the first to adopt but the timing of its adoption is dictated by the threat that its rival can make a pre-emptive move. In some cases the lower-cost firm does pre-empt its higher-cost rival and it is optimal for the higher-cost firm to sit idle while this happens. Such an outcome is possible even when both firms have the same per unit production costs after adoption. This work expands on existing literature in that it is the first to consider output rate selection, pricing decisions and technology investments in a continuous time framework while considering a real deferral option and asymmetric players.[Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions for the following free supplemental resource: Appendix]
Suggested Citation
Chester Chambers & Panos Kouvelis & Ping Su, 2009.
"Adoption of cost-reducing technology by asymmetric duopolists in stochastically evolving markets,"
IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 145-157.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:41:y:2009:i:2:p:145-157
DOI: 10.1080/07408170802116313
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:41:y:2009:i:2:p:145-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.