IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v41y2009i11p957-968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studies on a biobjective robust design optimization problem

Author

Listed:
  • Sangmun Shin
  • Byung Cho

Abstract

The vast majority of the multiobjective robust design research reported in the literature has been performed under the assumption of multiple quality characteristics. This paper differs in that the process mean and variance are considered to be a biobjective problem since the primary goal of robust design is to determine the optimal robust design factor settings by minimizing performance variability and deviation from a target value of a product. A more comprehensive set of solutions is developed using a lexicographic weighted Tchebycheff approach to the biobjective robust design model rather than the approaches traditionally used in the dual-response approach to obtain efficient solutions. Numerical examples show that the proposed model is far more effective than the traditional weighted sum approach.[Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of IIE Transactions for the following free supplemental resource: Appendix with mathematical proof, figures, and tables.]

Suggested Citation

  • Sangmun Shin & Byung Cho, 2009. "Studies on a biobjective robust design optimization problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 957-968.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:41:y:2009:i:11:p:957-968
    DOI: 10.1080/07408170902789084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07408170902789084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07408170902789084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:41:y:2009:i:11:p:957-968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.