IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v96y2025i2p306-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships and Identity Influences on Engineering Doctoral Degree Completion Intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Bahnson
  • Derrick Satterfield
  • Adam Kirn
  • Elan C. Hope

Abstract

Doctoral engineering students leave doctoral programs without their intended degrees at high rates, with students from minoritized groups leaving at higher rates. In the current study, we modeled the associations between academic relationships, professional identity, and degree completion intentions (DCI). Positive academic relationships with research advisors and peers within doctoral degree programs can bolster persistence and professional identity development. Professional identity is proposed as a mediator of academic relationships on DCI. Participants were 913 doctoral engineering students from 113 universities across the United States. Using structural equation modeling, we found support for the proposed direct and indirect effects. A multigroup model was tested with six groups: underrepresented minority (URM) women, Asian women, white women, URM men, Asian men, and white men. The model fit remained strong. The model provides insights into ways engineering education systems may engage advisors and peers to support students as an avenue to increasing persistence to a degree. The findings highlight the importance of equitable systems, structures, and relationships that serve underrepresented students.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Bahnson & Derrick Satterfield & Adam Kirn & Elan C. Hope, 2025. "Relationships and Identity Influences on Engineering Doctoral Degree Completion Intentions," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(2), pages 306-332, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:2:p:306-332
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2024.2397311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2024.2397311
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2024.2397311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:96:y:2025:i:2:p:306-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.