IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v95y2024i3p350-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dream Deferred: Post-Traditional College Trajectories and the Evolving Logic of College Plans

Author

Listed:
  • George Spencer
  • Janine de Novais
  • Emily Carolyn Chen-Bendle
  • Elizabeth Ndika

Abstract

Despite high college expectations and enrollments among young people, their trajectories through higher education have become increasingly complex. Even after initially starting as “traditional” students, many college graduates are only able to complete a bachelor’s degree after a series of stops and starts across multiple institutions. While there is a growing body of research regarding nontraditional students, we know very little about how these individuals make sense of their trajectories. This qualitative study draws on interviews with 40 college graduates who attained a bachelor’s degree following an extended and interrupted path. We consider how these individuals, who we define as post-traditional graduates, come to understand the value of college, distinguishing between the moral value, referred to as the expressive logic, and more practical and economic explanations, referred to as the instrumental logic. Our study found that an instrumental logic characterized the beginning of their college journeys, but what sustained our participants over time was an expressive logic: an evolved understanding of college as a process conferring personal development and moral worth.

Suggested Citation

  • George Spencer & Janine de Novais & Emily Carolyn Chen-Bendle & Elizabeth Ndika, 2024. "A Dream Deferred: Post-Traditional College Trajectories and the Evolving Logic of College Plans," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 95(3), pages 350-372, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:95:y:2024:i:3:p:350-372
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2023.2216611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2023.2216611
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2023.2216611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:95:y:2024:i:3:p:350-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.