Author
Listed:
- Whitney E. Wall Bortz
- David B. Knight
- Chelsea H. Lyles
- Timothy Kinoshita
- Nathan H. Choe
- Maya Denton
- Maura Borrego
Abstract
Doctoral student recruitment is a dynamic, complex, and under-researched phenomenon. There is steep competition between programs for recruiting students with large amounts of resources at stake, especially within the STEM fields, and programs do not operate in isolation within such environments. In this paper, we explore how graduate programs position themselves relative to other programs as they recruit STEM doctoral students. Drawing from 47 interviews with graduate program leaders, 49 interviews with graduate students, and 63 questionnaire responses from graduate program staff and administrators, this research analyzes common recruitment practices of STEM doctoral programs alongside student perspectives about their decision processes. We reveal how competitive forces may lead programs to adopt non-evidence-based recruitment strategies that may not align with either program leaders’ stated values or students’ priorities. Although program leaders expressed the importance of students prioritizing academic factors in their decisions, our data revealed that programs commonly utilize financial resources as their main recruitment mechanism in practice. By demonstrating this incongruence, our paper aims to illuminate a potential blind spot so programs might choose to change seemingly institutionalized processes that may be out of alignment with their own stated values and those of the students they are seeking to recruit.
Suggested Citation
Whitney E. Wall Bortz & David B. Knight & Chelsea H. Lyles & Timothy Kinoshita & Nathan H. Choe & Maya Denton & Maura Borrego, 2020.
"A Competitive System: Graduate Student Recruitment in STEM and Why Money May Not be the Answer,"
The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(6), pages 927-952, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:91:y:2020:i:6:p:927-952
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2019.1706017
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:91:y:2020:i:6:p:927-952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.