IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v39y2024i1p17-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the dimensions of the Mawhiba-IAU summer enrichment program

Author

Listed:
  • Omar M. Muammar
  • Fahad S. Alfaiz

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the most critical dimensions of summer enrichment programs (SEPs) for gifted students. The researchers conducted the study in Saudi Arabia with students from grades nine to 11 at a gifted summer program in a public university. The total number of students was 172 gifted students (62 female and 110 male). The study was guided by two research questions, and a 43-item survey was used to collect the data. The authors used correlation, t-test, and multiple linear regression for data analysis. They found that psycho-social skills, logistics, and science content dimensions were correlated significantly with students’ overall satisfaction in SEPs. The researchers found that nearly 27% of the variance was attributed to the psycho-social skills program dimension, while the logistics dimension accounted for 24%; the science content dimension accounted for 21% of students’ satisfaction. The researchers found that, for male students, the logistics dimension was the highest contributing dimension to satisfaction, while the science dimension was the highest for female students. No significant differences were found between the gender on overall satisfaction and the psycho-social skills dimension. The authors encourage other researchers to examine these dimensions with students in different settings and types of gifted programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar M. Muammar & Fahad S. Alfaiz, 2024. "Evaluation of the dimensions of the Mawhiba-IAU summer enrichment program," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 17-31, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:39:y:2024:i:1:p:17-31
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2023.2286024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2023.2286024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2023.2286024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:39:y:2024:i:1:p:17-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.