IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugtixx/v32y2017i2p134-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Svenja Matheis
  • Leonie Kronborg
  • Manfred Schmitt
  • Franzis Preckel

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about gifted students’ characteristics compared to students with average-ability and the teachers’ motivation (i.e., enthusiasm, self-efficacy). We investigated pre-service teachers’ beliefs and motivational orientations as substantial components of their professional competencies and aimed to make an empirical contribution to the discussion on the professionalization of teachers in gifted education. We expected that beliefs about the gifted would be in line with the disharmony hypothesis assuming they were intellectually strong, but deficient in non-cognitive domains. German (n = 375) and Australian (n = 315) pre-service teachers participated in a between-subjects experimental design that used student vignettes varying in ability and gender. Repeated-measures ANOVAs showed that besides a high intellect, pre-service teachers from both countries associated maladjustment with giftedness and showed lower self-efficacy for teaching the gifted. Results from structural equation modeling indicated that high intelligence ratings when paired with high maladjustment ratings were associated with lower teacher motivation. This result is of high practical relevance as perceived self-efficacy relates to actual teaching behavior in a classroom. Implications for teacher education in gifted education are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Svenja Matheis & Leonie Kronborg & Manfred Schmitt & Franzis Preckel, 2017. "Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation," Gifted and Talented International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 134-160, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:32:y:2017:i:2:p:134-160
    DOI: 10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15332276.2018.1537685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugtixx:v:32:y:2017:i:2:p:134-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.